DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volvo V40 vs 1996 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 323
VolvoMakeMazda
V40Model323
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 323
13,0 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
185 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
105 HPPower82 HP
143 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank47 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,5 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size185/65 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 323
4480 mmLength4340 mm
1720 mmWidth1710 mm
1410 mmHeight1420 mm
1250 KgWeight1170 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volvo V40 and 1996 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…