DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Escort vs 1996 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolvo
EscortModelV40
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
172 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
90 HPPower105 HP
180 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13 TTyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4293 mmLength4480 mm
1700 mmWidth1720 mm
1394 mmHeight1410 mm
1155 KgWeight1250 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Escort and 1996 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…