DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Citroen AX vs 1996 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen AXSpecificationVolvo V40
CitroenMakeVolvo
AXModelV40
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Citroen AXSpecificationVolvo V40
9,4 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
186 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1361 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
95 HPPower105 HP
117 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen AXSpecificationVolvo V40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen AXSpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R13Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen AXSpecificationVolvo V40
3517 mmLength4480 mm
1596 mmWidth1720 mm
1340 mmHeight1410 mm
795 KgWeight1250 Kg
2280 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Citroen AX and 1996 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…