DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 323 vs 1996 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationVolvo V40
MazdaMakeVolvo
323ModelV40
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationVolvo V40
14,2 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
170 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
82 HPPower105 HP
168 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationVolvo V40
DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14 STyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationVolvo V40
4340 mmLength4480 mm
1710 mmWidth1720 mm
1420 mmHeight1410 mm
1170 KgWeight1250 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 323 and 1996 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…