1996 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.6 16V (105 Hp) 1996Overall Score50.25/100
1996 Volvo V40 vs 1996 Citroen AX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Citroen
AX
Citroen AX 1.4i (95 Hp) 1996Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen AX
VolvoMakeCitroen
V40ModelAX
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen AX
13,0 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
185 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1361 cc
105 HPPower95 HP
143 NmTorque117 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen AX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank43 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen AX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size185/60 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen AX
4480 mmLength3517 mm
1720 mmWidth1596 mm
1410 mmHeight1340 mm
1250 KgWeight795 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2280 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volvo V40 and 1996 Citroen AX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…