DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Mark II vs 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMitsubishi
Mark IIModelL 200
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

165 km/hTop speed142 km/h
2446 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
97 HPPower100 HP
221 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
9 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4760 mmLength4500 mm
1760 mmWidth1655 mm
1400 mmHeight1570 mm
1400 KgWeight1810 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Mark II and 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…