DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Hiace vs 2000 Toyota Mark II Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Hiace

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
HiaceModelMark II
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2438 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
132 HPPower97 HP
204 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption9 lt
11,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/85 S R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4615 mmLength4760 mm
1690 mmWidth1760 mm
1935 mmHeight1400 mm
—Weight1400 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Hiace and 2000 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Hiace leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…