2000 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (109 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
2000 Ford Ranger vs 2000 Toyota Mark II Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Mark II
Toyota Mark II 2.4 TD (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationToyota Mark II
FordMakeToyota
RangerModelMark II
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationToyota Mark II
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
109 HPPower97 HP
266 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationToyota Mark II
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationToyota Mark II
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationToyota Mark II
5020 mmLength4760 mm
1695 mmWidth1760 mm
1750 mmHeight1400 mm
1399 KgWeight1400 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Ranger and 2000 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSDodge Caravan vs Ford Ranger2000 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSToyota Mark II vs Ford Ranger2000 and 2000 model years
VSLand Rover Range Rover vs Ford Ranger2000 and 2000 model years
VSFord Ranger vs Ford Ranger1999 and 2000 model years
VSJeep Cherokee vs Ford Ranger1999 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…