DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2000 Toyota Mark II Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
L 200ModelMark II
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

142 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
100 HPPower97 HP
240 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4760 mm
1655 mmWidth1760 mm
1570 mmHeight1400 mm
1810 KgWeight1400 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2000 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…