DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Mark II vs 2000 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
Mark IIModelRanger
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2446 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
97 HPPower109 HP
221 NmTorque266 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
9 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4760 mmLength5020 mm
1760 mmWidth1695 mm
1400 mmHeight1750 mm
1400 KgWeight1399 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Mark II and 2000 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…