DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Estima vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Estima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAlfa Romeo
EstimaModel166
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed202 km/h
2364 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
160 HPPower136 HP
221 NmTorque304 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption9,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
215 / 60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16W
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength4720 mm
1790 mmWidth1815 mm
1785 mmHeight1416 mm
1730 KgWeight1490 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Estima and 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Estima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…