DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2000 Toyota Estima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Estima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeToyota
166ModelEstima
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
202 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2364 cc
136 HPPower160 HP
304 NmTorque221 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears—
205/55 R16WTyre size215 / 60 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4770 mm
1815 mmWidth1790 mm
1416 mmHeight1785 mm
1490 KgWeight1730 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2000 Toyota Estima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Estima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…