DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Toyota Estima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Estima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeToyota
FreelanderModelEstima
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
3Doors4

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2364 cc
177 HPPower160 HP
240 NmTorque221 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption—
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears—
215/65 R16Tyre size215 / 60 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4770 mm
1809 mmWidth1790 mm
1709 mmHeight1785 mm
1550 KgWeight1730 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Toyota Estima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Estima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…