DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML vs 2000 Toyota Estima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Estima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeToyota
MLModelEstima
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2364 cc
150 HPPower160 HP
220 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank70 lt
17,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
12,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
225/75 R16Tyre size215 / 60 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4587 mmLength4770 mm
1833 mmWidth1790 mm
1802 mmHeight1785 mm
1855 KgWeight1730 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML and 2000 Toyota Estima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Estima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…