DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Estima vs 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Estima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMercedes-Benz
EstimaModelML
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
2364 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
160 HPPower150 HP
221 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank83 lt
—Urban consumption17,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
—Average consumption12,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
215 / 60 R16Tyre size225/75 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength4587 mm
1790 mmWidth1833 mm
1785 mmHeight1802 mm
1730 KgWeight1855 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Estima and 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Estima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…