DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Estima vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Estima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeLand Rover
EstimaModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,1 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2364 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
160 HPPower177 HP
221 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption17,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears4
215 / 60 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength4433 mm
1790 mmWidth1809 mm
1785 mmHeight1709 mm
1730 KgWeight1550 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Estima and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Estima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…