DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeVolvo
Grand VitaraModelS40
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

14,4 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1586 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
106 HPPower100 HP
145 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/70 R16 102STyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4035 mmLength4476 mm
1810 mmWidth1770 mm
1695 mmHeight1454 mm
1482 KgWeight1311 Kg
2440 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…