DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mini Countryman vs 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeSuzuki
CountrymanModelGrand Vitara
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSUV
4/5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h14,4 s
173 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1586 cc
98 HPPower106 HP
153 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
205/60 R16 92HTyre size225/70 R16 102S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4097 mmLength4035 mm
1789 mmWidth1810 mm
1561 mmHeight1695 mm
1265 KgWeight1482 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mini Countryman and 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…