DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSuzuki
S40ModelGrand Vitara
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h14,4 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1586 cc
100 HPPower106 HP
150 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size225/70 R16 102S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4476 mmLength4035 mm
1770 mmWidth1810 mm
1454 mmHeight1695 mm
1311 KgWeight1482 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…