2012 • Mini
Convertible
Mini Convertible 1.6 (98 Hp) 2012Overall Score53.25/100
2012 Mini Convertible vs 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Suzuki
Grand Vitara
Suzuki Grand Vitara 1.6 (106 Hp) 2012Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Suzuki Grand Vitara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mini ConvertibleSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
MiniMakeSuzuki
ConvertibleModelGrand Vitara
2012Model year2012
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats4
2Doors3
Performance
Mini ConvertibleSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
11,3 s0–100 km/h14,4 s
181 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1586 cc
98 HPPower106 HP
153 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mini ConvertibleSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mini ConvertibleSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
175/65 R15 84HTyre size225/70 R16 102S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mini ConvertibleSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
3723 mmLength4035 mm
1683 mmWidth1810 mm
1414 mmHeight1695 mm
1160 KgWeight1482 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2440 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mini Convertible and 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…