DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Subaru Forester vs 2012 Toyota RAV4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeToyota
ForesterModelRAV4
2012Model year2012
CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
186 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1987 cc
147 HPPower151 HP
350 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4560 mmLength4570 mm
1780 mmWidth1845 mm
1700 mmHeight1660 mm
1540 KgWeight—
—Wheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Subaru Forester and 2012 Toyota RAV4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…