DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 SsangYong Chairman vs 2012 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeSubaru
ChairmanModelForester
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
197 km/hTop speed186 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower147 HP
220 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption—
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5055 mmLength4560 mm
1825 mmWidth1780 mm
1465 mmHeight1700 mm
1700 KgWeight1540 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 SsangYong Chairman and 2012 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…