DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda CX-5 vs 2012 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSubaru
CX-5ModelForester
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
197 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
160 HPPower147 HP
208 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4560 mm
1840 mmWidth1780 mm
1710 mmHeight1700 mm
1488 KgWeight1540 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…