DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Toyota RAV4 vs 2012 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeSubaru
RAV4ModelForester
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
185 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1987 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
151 HPPower147 HP
195 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4570 mmLength4560 mm
1845 mmWidth1780 mm
1660 mmHeight1700 mm
—Weight1540 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Toyota RAV4 and 2012 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…