DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Subaru Forester vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMazda
ForesterModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
186 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
147 HPPower160 HP
350 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption8,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4560 mmLength4555 mm
1780 mmWidth1840 mm
1700 mmHeight1710 mm
1540 KgWeight1488 Kg
—Wheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Subaru Forester and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…