2005 • Smart
Crossblade
Smart Crossblade 0.6 i (70 Hp) 2005Overall Score42.5/100
2005 Smart Crossblade vs 2004 Smart Roadster Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Smart
Roadster
Smart Roadster 0.7 i (61 Hp) 2004Overall Score43.25/100
WINNER
Smart Roadster
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSmart Roadster
SmartMakeSmart
CrossbladeModelRoadster
2005Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSmart Roadster
16,8 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
135 km/hTop speed160 km/h
599 ccEngine displacement698 cc
70 HPPower61 HP
100 NmTorque95 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSmart Roadster
PetrolFuel typePetrol
22 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSmart Roadster
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/40 R16; 215/35 R16Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSmart Roadster
2500 mmLength3427 mm
1515 mmWidth1615 mm
1549 mmHeight1207 mm
730 KgWeight790 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Smart Crossblade and 2004 Smart Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…