DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Micra vs 2005 Smart Crossblade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeSmart
MicraModelCrossblade
2004Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3/5Doors2

Performance

15,7 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
154 km/hTop speed135 km/h
998 ccEngine displacement599 cc
65 HPPower70 HP
89 NmTorque100 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank22 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
165/70 R14Tyre size195/40 R16; 215/35 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3715 mmLength2500 mm
1660 mmWidth1515 mm
1525 mmHeight1549 mm
940 KgWeight730 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase1812 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Micra and 2005 Smart Crossblade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…