DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Smart Roadster vs 2005 Smart Crossblade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeSmart
RoadsterModelCrossblade
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
160 km/hTop speed135 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement599 cc
61 HPPower70 HP
95 NmTorque100 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank22 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
185/55 R15Tyre size195/40 R16; 215/35 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3427 mmLength2500 mm
1615 mmWidth1515 mm
1207 mmHeight1549 mm
790 KgWeight730 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase1812 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Smart Roadster and 2005 Smart Crossblade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…