DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Daewoo Matiz vs 2005 Smart Crossblade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Matiz

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeSmart
MatizModelCrossblade
2004Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
152 km/hTop speed135 km/h
995 ccEngine displacement599 cc
64 HPPower70 HP
87 NmTorque100 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank22 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
155/65 R13Tyre size195/40 R16; 215/35 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3495 mmLength2500 mm
1495 mmWidth1515 mm
1485 mmHeight1549 mm
826 KgWeight730 Kg
2340 mmWheelbase1812 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Daewoo Matiz and 2005 Smart Crossblade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Matiz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…