2005 • Smart
Crossblade
Smart Crossblade 0.6 i (70 Hp) 2005Overall Score42.5/100
2005 Smart Crossblade vs 2004 Nissan Micra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Nissan
Micra
Nissan Micra 1.0 i 16V (65 Hp) 2004Overall Score43.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Micra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationNissan Micra
SmartMakeNissan
CrossbladeModelMicra
2005Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5
Performance
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationNissan Micra
16,8 s0–100 km/h15,7 s
135 km/hTop speed154 km/h
599 ccEngine displacement998 cc
70 HPPower65 HP
100 NmTorque89 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationNissan Micra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
22 ltFuel tank46 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationNissan Micra
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/40 R16; 215/35 R16Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationNissan Micra
2500 mmLength3715 mm
1515 mmWidth1660 mm
1549 mmHeight1525 mm
730 KgWeight940 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2430 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Smart Crossblade and 2004 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…