DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saturn SL vs 2000 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saturn SLSpecificationBMW Z3
SaturnMakeBMW
SLModelZ3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Saturn SLSpecificationBMW Z3
—0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1901 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
100 HPPower118 HP
155 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saturn SLSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption11 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Saturn SLSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saturn SLSpecificationBMW Z3
4524 mmLength4050 mm
1687 mmWidth1740 mm
1397 mmHeight1288 mm
1058 KgWeight1220 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saturn SL and 2000 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…