DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Saturn SL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationSaturn SL
BMWMakeSaturn
Z3ModelSL
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationSaturn SL
10,4 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
118 HPPower100 HP
190 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationSaturn SL
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank46 lt
11 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationSaturn SL
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationSaturn SL
4050 mmLength4524 mm
1740 mmWidth1687 mm
1288 mmHeight1397 mm
1220 KgWeight1058 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Saturn SL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…