DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Carina vs 2000 Saturn SL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.5–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeSaturn
CarinaModelSL
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1975 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
90 HPPower100 HP
203 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption8,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4495 mmLength4524 mm
1695 mmWidth1687 mm
1410 mmHeight1397 mm
1130 KgWeight1058 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Carina and 2000 Saturn SL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…