DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Saturn SL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeSaturn
FreelanderModelSL
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
117 HPPower100 HP
160 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank46 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4524 mm
1809 mmWidth1687 mm
1708 mmHeight1397 mm
1510 KgWeight1058 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Saturn SL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…