DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saturn SL vs 2000 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saturn SLSpecificationRover 25
SaturnMakeRover
SLModel25
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Saturn SLSpecificationRover 25
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1901 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
100 HPPower101 HP
155 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saturn SLSpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saturn SLSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saturn SLSpecificationRover 25
4524 mmLength3990 mm
1687 mmWidth1688 mm
1397 mmHeight1419 mm
1058 KgWeight1130 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saturn SL and 2000 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…