E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Rover 400 vs 1995 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
RoverMakeAudi
400Model80
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeEstate
4+1Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h14,1 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1800 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
88 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque148 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption10,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 80
—Length4482 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1408 mm
—Weight1230 Kg
—Wheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Rover 400 and 1995 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1995 Seat ToledoVS1995 Rover 400Seat Toledo vs Rover 4001995 and 1995 model years1995 Volkswagen GolfVS1995 Rover 400Volkswagen Golf vs Rover 4001995 and 1995 model years1995 Volkswagen JettaVS1995 Rover 400Volkswagen Jetta vs Rover 4001995 and 1995 model years1995 Volkswagen PoloVS1995 Rover 400Volkswagen Polo vs Rover 4001995 and 1995 model years1995 Audi 80VS1995 Rover 400Audi 80 vs Rover 4001995 and 1995 model years

Comments are loading…