DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Seat Toledo vs 1995 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Toledo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeRover
ToledoModel400
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats4+1
4Doors5

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1800 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
202 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
185/60 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

4321 mmLength—
1662 mmWidth—
1421 mmHeight—
1080 KgWeight—
2471 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Seat Toledo and 1995 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…