E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
AudiMakeRover
80Model400
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats4+1
5Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
14,1 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1800 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
148 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
4482 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1408 mmHeight—
1230 KgWeight—
2612 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1995 Mazda 626VS1995 Audi 80Mazda 626 vs Audi 801995 and 1995 model yearsImage unavailableVS1995 Audi 80Nissan AD vs Audi 801995 and 1995 model years1995 Nissan BluebirdVS1995 Audi 80Nissan Bluebird vs Audi 801995 and 1995 model years1995 Seat ToledoVS1995 Audi 80Seat Toledo vs Audi 801995 and 1995 model years1995 Volkswagen GolfVS1995 Audi 80Volkswagen Golf vs Audi 801995 and 1995 model years

Comments are loading…