1995 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.9 TDI (90 Hp) 1995Overall Score52.25/100
1995 Volkswagen Polo vs 1995 Rover 400 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Rover
400
Rover 400 1.8 TD (88 Hp) 1995Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationRover 400
VolkswagenMakeRover
PoloModel400
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats4+1
5Doors5
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationRover 400
12,0 s0–100 km/h—
176 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1800 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
202 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationRover 400
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationRover 400
4137 mmLength—
1640 mmWidth—
1433 mmHeight—
1170 KgWeight—
2444 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Volkswagen Polo and 1995 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…