1996 • Rover
400
Rover 400 1.6i (112 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
1996 Rover 400 vs 1996 Renault Megane Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 1.9 dTi (98 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Rover 400
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 400SpecificationRenault Megane
RoverMakeRenault
400ModelMegane
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Rover 400SpecificationRenault Megane
10,0 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
190 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
112 HPPower98 HP
138 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 400SpecificationRenault Megane
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
10 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 400SpecificationRenault Megane
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 HTyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 400SpecificationRenault Megane
4365 mmLength4440 mm
1680 mmWidth1699 mm
1390 mmHeight1420 mm
1125 KgWeight1135 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2580 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Rover 400 and 1996 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…