DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault Megane vs 1996 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRover
MeganeModel400
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
183 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
98 HPPower112 HP
200 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption10 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4365 mm
1699 mmWidth1680 mm
1420 mmHeight1390 mm
1135 KgWeight1125 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault Megane and 1996 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…