1997 • Alfa Romeo
156
Alfa Romeo 156 1.6 16V T.S. (120 Hp) 1997Overall Score52.5/100
1997 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 1996 Rover 400 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Rover
400
Rover 400 1.6i (112 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Rover 400
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationRover 400
Alfa RomeoMakeRover
156Model400
1997Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationRover 400
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
120 HPPower112 HP
144 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationRover 400
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption10 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65R15Tyre size175/65 R14 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationRover 400
4430 mmLength4365 mm
1745 mmWidth1680 mm
1415 mmHeight1390 mm
1230 KgWeight1125 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Alfa Romeo 156 and 1996 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…