1996 • Alfa Romeo
146
Alfa Romeo 146 1.7 i.e. 16V (129 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
1996 Alfa Romeo 146 vs 1996 Rover 400 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Rover
400
Rover 400 1.6i (112 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Rover 400
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationRover 400
Alfa RomeoMakeRover
146Model400
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationRover 400
10,2 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
202 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1712 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
129 HPPower112 HP
148 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationRover 400
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationRover 400
4257 mmLength4365 mm
1712 mmWidth1680 mm
1425 mmHeight1390 mm
1225 KgWeight1125 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Alfa Romeo 146 and 1996 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…