DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Audi TT vs 2002 Nissan Cima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationNissan Cima
AudiMakeNissan
TTModelCima
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationNissan Cima
6,4 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3189 ccEngine displacement2988 cc
250 HPPower280 HP
320 NmTorque387 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationNissan Cima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationNissan Cima
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationNissan Cima
4041 mmLength4970 mm
1764 mmWidth1820 mm
1345 mmHeight1450 mm
1520 KgWeight1670 Kg
2429 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Audi TT and 2002 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…