2002 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0 i V6 24V (280 Hp) 2002Overall Score81.75/100
2002 Nissan Cedric vs 2002 Audi TT Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Audi
TT
Audi TT 3.2i V6 24V (250 Hp) 2002Overall Score80.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi TT
NissanMakeAudi
CedricModelTT
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi TT
—0–100 km/h6,4 s
220 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement3189 cc
280 HPPower250 HP
387 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi TT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
18 ltUrban consumption14,9 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi TT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
205/60 R16 HTyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi TT
4860 mmLength4041 mm
1770 mmWidth1764 mm
1450 mmHeight1345 mm
1660 KgWeight1520 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2429 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Nissan Cedric and 2002 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…