DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chrysler Concorde vs 2002 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeAudi
ConcordeModelTT
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,4 s
225 km/hTop speed235 km/h
3518 ccEngine displacement3189 cc
258 HPPower250 HP
348 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank62 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption14,9 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength4041 mm
1890 mmWidth1764 mm
1435 mmHeight1345 mm
1690 KgWeight1520 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2429 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chrysler Concorde and 2002 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…