2002 • Nissan
Cima
Nissan Cima 3.0 i V6 24V Turbo (280 Hp) 2002Overall Score81.75/100
2002 Nissan Cima vs 2002 Audi TT Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Audi
TT
Audi TT 3.2i V6 24V (250 Hp) 2002Overall Score80.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Cima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi TT
NissanMakeAudi
CimaModelTT
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi TT
—0–100 km/h6,4 s
230 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement3189 cc
280 HPPower250 HP
387 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi TT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption14,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
11 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi TT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi TT
4970 mmLength4041 mm
1820 mmWidth1764 mm
1450 mmHeight1345 mm
1670 KgWeight1520 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2429 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Nissan Cima and 2002 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…