DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Audi TT vs 2002 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeChrysler
TTModelConcorde
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed225 km/h
3189 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
250 HPPower258 HP
320 NmTorque348 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank65 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
225/45 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4041 mmLength5310 mm
1764 mmWidth1890 mm
1345 mmHeight1435 mm
1520 KgWeight1690 Kg
2429 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Audi TT and 2002 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…