DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Audi TT vs 2012 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMitsubishi
TTModelASX
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSUV
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h—
226 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
170 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4198 mmLength4295 mm
1842 mmWidth1770 mm
1353 mmHeight1625 mm
1405 KgWeight1460 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Audi TT and 2012 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…