DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2012 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeAudi
CaptivaModelTT
2013Model year2012
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
180 km/hTop speed226 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
163 HPPower170 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x2Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
AutomaticTransmission—
17Tyre size225/55 R16
NoABSYes

Dimensions

4679 mmLength4198 mm
1868 mmWidth1842 mm
1756 mmHeight1353 mm
1903 kgWeight1405 Kg
447 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chevrolet Captiva and 2012 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…